The post Nepal’s Oli Govt in 2018 – Achievements, Failures and Questions Unanswered! appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>The Nepal Communist Party (NCP) Chair and Nepal Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli was received amidst opposition parties’ critical uproar in the Parliament on January 06, 2019.
This was the first time Oli addressed a parliamentary session ever since the winter session began on December 26, 2018.
PM Oli’s speech focusing on his government’s efforts for Nepal’s progress throughout the first year of his regime spanned higher growth, curbed-corruption, and improved law and order situation.
However, Oli’s presentation of Nepal’s progress path didn’t seem to satisfy its main opposition Nepali Congress (NC), whose lawmakers were quick to sought clarifications.
NC lawmakers Dilendra Prasad Badu and Minendra Rijal were first to seek permission from Speaker Krishna Bahadur Mahara to speak to Oli. But the Speaker refused their request after Oli clearly stated that he did not want to take any questions from the opposition.
A number of lawmakers from Oli’s own NCP opined that his parliamentary address was ill-timed and could have waited until his party completed its first term in office.
PM Oli emphasized seven indicators of the budget implementation and their status during the parliament including the balance of payment, capital expenditure, economic growth, employment revenue collection & financial situation, implementation of flagship program and progress made in the implementation of national pride projects.
The government decided to grant five percent concession on 15 exportable goods and three percent on 11 exportable items to promote export
Providing the status on railway achievements he said:
The Prime Minister also added that a Public Transportation Authority will be formed to manage post-syndicate turmoil in the transportation system. He hailed his administration’s efforts to control crime stating that the Police Administration achieved 96 percent success in curbing crimes.
However, Oli’s report failed to discuss some of Nepal’s major concerns, for which, he received severe criticism from opposition parties and raised questions on his role.
Following are the discrepancies observed in Oli’s presentation:
“Import of industrial goods and construction material has increased by 40.6 percent and this has hit the balance of payment. But this is a positive indicator for the country’s production and development,” reads an excerpt from Oli’s speech.
“The White Paper had tweaked economic information to fit Khatiwada’s approach to show the economy in a bad shape, and Oli has now done the same. Oli has manipulated information in his speech. He has also tried to threaten his critics about the procurement of project war room in his office,” said Thapa.
“Oli remains silent why the outflow of migrant workers to Malaysia has not yet started but claims that the remittance collection has grown due to administrative reforms,” adds Thapa.
PM Oli states that the number of migrant workers declined by 41 percent but the remittance inflow increased by 36 percent.
Besides, while Oli presented a good picture of Nepal’s economy at the beginning of his speech, it’s a well-known fact that just nine months before this statement, Finance Minister Yubaraj Khatiwada introduced a white paper which depicted a shoddy state of the country’s economy.
Other untouched/less discussed issues include 13-year old Nirmala Pant’s case and President Buda Devi’s purchase of expensive means of transport including a helicopter.
The meeting portrayed Oli’s contributions to Nepal’s progress in very poor light. Many have begun to raise questions on his ability as Nepal’s Prime Minister.
“The thumping of desks by NCP lawmakers was muted today, which indicated Oli’s performance had deteriorated,” remarked Thapa.
The post Nepal’s Oli Govt in 2018 – Achievements, Failures and Questions Unanswered! appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>The post Cut Down Interest Rates, FNCCI Tells NRB appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>The Commerce body criticized the financial authority for abruptly increasing the interest rates, at a meeting with NRB Governor Chiranjibi Nepal.
“The banks have increased interest rates without considering the loan repayment capacity of the debtors, which will directly affect the cost of the ongoing projects while hitting hard the projects that are on pipeline,” reads FNCCI press statement.
The private sector has also demanded that NRB implement the following:
Currently, firms securing a loan of NPR 500 million and more have to receive a credit rating from the concerned agency and have to pay a commission charge of 0.1 percent for this.
FNCCI has asked the central bank to increase the minimum loan amount to NPR 1 billion and reduce the commission fee.
Additionally, the Commerce authority asked for promotion of e-commerce and waiving the customs duty on Tibet-imported goods in an event when the payment is made through bank drafts, letter of credit or TT.
On the occasion, FNCCI also expressed concern over the government’s slow progress on spending the country’s capital expenditure.
The post Cut Down Interest Rates, FNCCI Tells NRB appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>The post Nepal’s Capital Expenditure Witnesses Slump appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>Three years ago, the budget announcement date was moved from May-end to mid-July giving the government more time for budget endorsement and increasing capital expenditure.
However, this move has failed with the government unable to bring the expected rise in capital expenditure.
According to Nepal Finance Ministry (MoF) records, the country’s capital expenditure in FY 2015-16, 2016-17 & FY 2017-18 was 59, 66 and 84 percent respectively.
Despite this increase over the last three years, Nepal’s FY 2015-18 capital expenditure remained at an average 69 percent (period when budget announcement date was extended). Before this period, the country recorded an average capital expenditure of 77 percent.
As per the Finance Ministry, inadequate ownership in implementation was responsible for slow capital spending.
“Besides, problems seen in the disbursement process are also among the main causes behind the low capital expenditure,” the Ministry stated in a report submitted to the Parliamentary Finance Committee.
Revenue Secretary Shishir Kumar Dhungana identified delays in land acquisition and delegation of authority as key reasons for failure in proper implementation of the annual budget despite early announcement.
“Lack of proper preparation of the envisioned projects and government agencies demanding inflated budgets not based on actual need and capacity are among the underlying problems,” said Dhungana.
Speaking about Nepal’s capital expenditure this year Dhungana says,
“Although authority has been delegated to local governments to make decisions on a number of development projects, the federal government is yet to come up with clear demarcation of the areas of expenditure.”
Despite several attempts in the past including a ‘time-bound action plan’ implemented by the MoF, the country has been unable to enhance its slow capital spending.
Continuing its efforts and coming up with a different solution this time, the Nepal Government has formed a five-member ‘Public Expenditure Review Committee’ under the leadership of Dilli Raj Khanal.
Additionally, it has stipulated a Treasury Single Account system to enhance the budget disbursement pattern.
The Parliamentary Committee has also given the government a budget spending time frame of 60 percent in the second quarter, 30 percent by mid-May and the remaining 10 percent in the last month of the fiscal year.
The post Nepal’s Capital Expenditure Witnesses Slump appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>The post Nepal Capex: Structural Concerns Haunt Budget Execution! appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>Nepal’s capex saw a five-year high at Rs 267.25 billion in the FY 2017-18 that ended mid-July 2018, with the last month of the fiscal alone witnessing Rs 108 billion spending.
The government drew wide criticism for its rush spending in the last month!
Responding to remarks over the spending rush, the Finance Minister Yubaraj Khatiwada recently made new statements citing ‘dependence on revenue collection’ as the key reason behind the last-hour spending.
Government’s expenses, mainly capital expenses rise in the last quarter of the fiscal because the payments are issued based on revenue collection. Revenue collection surges only after the first half, says Khatiwada.
He further informed that the budgets for developmental projects were released in the third and last quarters of the fiscal after reviewing the performance of the completed tasks and that doesn’t mean the projects were taken up in the last month.
“Contractors who completed works in the third quarter might have received payments in the last quarter,” he added, while also admitting delays on contractors’ side in executing tasks.
Key Structural Concerns Haunting!
Ending the criticism, Khatiwada noted that the government will soon take necessary measures to address the structural concerns pertaining to budget execution.
In this regard, he highlighted key concerns that are acting as hurdles for the government.
Tax Revenues: According to the minister, timely collection of tax revenues in line with the taxation rules is one major concern delaying the early release of payments from the government’s treasury.
The taxation rules mandate individuals to present 40 percent of the annual income tax estimation by the end of the first half of the fiscal, which decides the surge in governmental revenue for further spending.
Project Preparedness: Another key concern is the lack of preparedness in case of some projects put forth for inclusion in the budget.
Ministries select projects without any preparation. They should know that just announcing projects is not sufficient to implement them. They should at least understand the basics of project implementation, says the Finance Minister.
Need of the Hour
Khatiwada pitches for early addressal of the aforementioned problems to ensure planned budgetary execution.
The minister calls for trimming down the projects that lack early preparedness.
The concept of a project bank must be established, and only matured projects should be included in the budget, says the Ministry of Finance.
He further pitched on the need for development of necessary measures that support project implementation driving planned execution through feasibility studies, environmental impact assessment, legal clearances, among others.
Highlighting lack of inter-agency coordination as another key concern, the minister said budget execution is a collective responsibility of all the related stakeholders followed by strict quality monitoring.
Related Articles:
The post Nepal Capex: Structural Concerns Haunt Budget Execution! appeared first on Nepali Sansar.
]]>